A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore parts are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which has considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire visual evidence of the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how the two men entered the h2o through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been covered in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard additional submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing paperwork, maps, and problems hooked up to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting alternatively that it's about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just trying to make a family members property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Particular Place of Conservation and say that all operates are performed according to Specialist information and Paul Feely authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-high water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result remains unsure. The courtroom ought to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Dwell along with each other long following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.